Provenance Pitfalls
“Provenance” is often used as a synonym for “a story.” In collecting, provenance is a chain of custody supported by documentation.
Maritime objects frequently pass through shipbreaking, auctions, chandlers, private swaps, estate sales, and dealer inventories—often without records.
This section is a field guide to the most common failure points, and how to keep claims aligned with what can actually be shown.
⁂ Guiding principle: Weak provenance does not automatically mean an item is fake.
It means the chain cannot be proven—and therefore the claim must stay modest.
What Provenance Is (and What It Isn’t)
Provenance
A documented chain of custody: who held the object, when, and how it transferred—supported by records that can be checked.
A story
A narrative about origin (“came from Titanic,” “recovered from the ship,” “from an officer’s estate”) without a document trail.
Stories can be true—but they are not self-proving.
Attribution
A claim about what the evidence supports (type, maker, period, line, ship). Provenance can support attribution, but it is not interchangeable with it.
The Most Common Provenance Pitfalls
These patterns show up again and again. Most are not “scams” so much as story inflation—small unknowns getting smoothed over into certainty.
1) “From an estate” without the person’s connection
Estate claims often lack the key link: what was the person’s role, what ship/line did they have access to, and is that documented?
“Estate” can mean anything from direct family retention to a resale lot with no primary context.
2) “Shipbreaker source” without records
Shipbreaking dispersal is real—but many objects changed hands multiple times. Without invoices, yard records, or contemporaneous documentation,
“came from the breakers” becomes a non-falsifiable claim.
3) Auction descriptions treated as primary evidence
Auction catalogs can be useful secondary sources, but they often repeat consignor narratives.
Unless a catalog cites documentation (and you can inspect it), treat it as attribution by the seller, not proof.
4) “Museum quality” and “COA” language
Certificates and “museum” phrasing are marketing devices unless they reference verifiable sources.
A COA is a claim about authenticity, not evidence of it.
5) The “famous ship magnet”
When a ship name dramatically increases price, stories tend to drift toward it over time.
If the object works equally well as a line-level or period-level item, assume the ship claim is the fragile part until proved.
6) Handwritten tags as identity documents
Tags can be helpful—especially if old, consistent, and context-rich—but handwriting is easy to add later.
A tag is best treated as a lead to investigate, not a final ID.
A Practical “Provenance Check” You Can Reuse
When a claim is made, run it through these questions. The goal is not to “disprove” everything—it’s to find the strongest defensible statement.
- What is the earliest documented appearance? A dated photo, receipt, letter, inventory list, or catalog entry beats oral tradition.
- Who is the named source, exactly? “A sailor,” “a steward,” and “a family friend” are not identities. Roles can be checked only when specific.
- Does the claimed access make sense? Would that person plausibly handle this category of object? (Store room vs passenger area vs engineering spaces.)
- Is the chain continuous? If there are gaps (“then it was sold around”), downgrade confidence. Gaps aren’t fatal—just limiting.
- What evidence is independent of the story? Maker marks, date marks, line marks, pattern matches—things that still exist even if the story disappears.
- What is the narrowest safe claim? Often: object type + maker + period + line-level context, stopping short of ship ID.
Practical takeaway: Most provenance narratives contain a true core plus added certainty.
Your job as a collector is to keep the description anchored to what survives: marks, materials, documentation, and comparisons.
How This Section Connects to the Rest of the Site
Pages in This Section
